How does a new universe form?
If we follow what appears to be a natural pattern, our universe may have formed as the result of a previous universe, perhaps evolving to energy maturity, spitting in two, and by so doing creating another vibrational void. A new bubble. This may happen naturally when a universe reaches a state of energy balance, whereby the amount of energy leakage from the low and high vibrational states has balanced to the point of stability. The result could be the spontaneous formation of a new bubble, which could possibly be described as a harmonic of the mature universe, since the new high and low energy states may be a final blend of the two original vibrational states.
This point might be reached when the two separate vibrational states balance their frequencies, such that the complete universe reverberated to a single note. At this point all energy in that universe would equal zero and it would lose all of its cohesive energy. This would mean it had no energy to hold itself together, but instead of collapsing into nothing, the rotational energy of the amassed multiple universes spins it into a new layer and splits the balanced universe into two parts, at the same time creating a new dimensional bubble, and a new space for a fresh universe to grow. A natural cycle of birth, life and death, creating the conditions for growth and for new life.
There is no 'dark matter' and there is no 'dark energy'.
These two imaginary energies are both theoretical, mathematical constructs, invented to balance equations for a universe where the basic model is wrong. The workings for the current model is only true in terms of the 'local' space-time energy density, and not in terms of variable space-time density that alters depending on your location in the universe, relative to the energy boundaries.
The quantum scientists, I believe, have figured out more about how it may really work, in their multiple-universes (mulitple-dimensional) thinking, but the astrophysicists, I feel, have completely lost the plot, and will move further away from any chance of defining their goal, of a unified theory of everything, if they continue to doggedly stick with their Big Bang model, despite the fact that it can be challenged by simple observational evidence.
"Most of the fundamental ideas of science are essentially simple, and
may, as a rule, be expressed in a language comprehensible to everyone."
From this point I will begin the process of bringing this part to a conclusion by moving its focus back from the macro-universe and down to the real world, in the here and now, and speculate on what role I think life and consciousness has to play in the scheme of things.
And, this is where it gets really exciting!
|
...back